The jumps between installments leave me feeling unsteady. Maybe I’m not following closely enough, or I’ve missed an explanatory detail. Am I correct in understanding that non-cons are a kind of mindless working class of human?
Thanks for the comment – always good to know someone other than the authors is reading this stuff.
I’m trying to spread the noncon exposition out over instalments while running the main plot at the same time – so I appreciate it’s a bit jumpy.
Things should hopefully settle down and make more sense in a while. Noncons are philosophical zombies: displaying normal human behaviour but devoid of awareness. They’re born that way. Now the technology exists to detect them, they’re removed from society and have their cortices ablated to turn them into mindless drones so they can be used as slave labour without the inconvenience of exhibiting (non-conscious) rebellious behaviour. Hope that’s now a bit clearer…
this is a fantastic story in progress. I like being a reader…It is flush with detail in setting and character. It also leaves the requisite intrigue and shadow to lure us in further. Great work to both! I am in!
Tsk, HSAR – you didn’t think I’d use that hackneyed old storyline, did you? ;)
But yes indeed: difficult to exposit in less than a-great-deal-more-words-than-Ficly-allows, hence the drip feed. I have occasionally come across this conflict between needing to exposit and needing to drive narrative, particulary in my early efforts – see eg A Ghost Story and The de Vrise cylinder for more of my greatest failures to tell a coherent story.